<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Independent survey of PATH train service</title>
		<description>Discuss Independent survey of PATH train service</description>
		<link>http://www.dailyharrison.com/harrison-news/town-latest-news/467-independent-survey-of-path-train-service-is-out</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:37:50 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.dailyharrison.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/467/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Paul_in_Kearny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dailyharrison.com/harrison-news/town-latest-news/467-independent-survey-of-path-train-service-is-out#comment-4</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not saying any of the conclusions are incorrect... but talk about a lesson in how to write a completely biased survey. Every single question is completely leading. Not to mention the partiality of an organization called "pathsux". Again... not saying the conclusions are necessarily wrong. It's just not exactly an un-biased survey and hence will not be very persuasive in convincing port authority to make any changes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul_in_Kearny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:53:00 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dailyharrison.com/harrison-news/town-latest-news/467-independent-survey-of-path-train-service-is-out#comment-4</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

